Can someone explain to me what was wrong with the article? How does it shed a poor light on hog hunting?
I personally thought the reporter wrote a fair and unbiased article about the hogs. The damage they can do to crops, and the risk of hunting them with dogs. Nothing I read sounded any different than what I read on here daily.
At what point to dog hunters stop being afraid of what the anti's think, and start standing up for their rights as dog hunters?
Ditto! Seems a lot of folks are way over thinking this.
