I am amazed on how many people want to assume they know the facts. First of all the mother of the owner of the property stopped several times and asked where "Lou and the rest of the crew were at?" Second hogmantx1979 was left to work by himself three days and got more done then a three man crew did in a week. Third of all, he was told not to show up several times because the dumpsters were full and they could not do anything more until they were empty. Reality is that Lou paid his " buddies" and is refusing to pay what is due to hogmantx1979 which makes him a liar and a theif. Hmmmmm who wants to see proof?
Now finally someone has something to say. Now you did throw in some opinions. 1st who cares what the mother of the owner did or said? She is not anyone that matters. Clearly sounds like Lou trusted hogmantx1979. 2nd sounds like Lou trusted him again. Why compare to other people? Did he get done what he said he would get done? 3rd if he did not show when told not to show up then that does not matter. Did he show up when he was told to be there? Did he get the work done that he was told to do? Did the amount of work he had to do get reduced from when the pay was discussed? I am not talking emotion but he came on here bashing someone with no facts. Kind of like a dog trade did the dog work like it should have or not? Not opinion or anger just facts. Unlike dogs a man's work can be measured. Was it pay for day or for work?
Now I like to spell out how much I am getting and what I have to do for it. I prefer to be paid for the work and just get it done. Pay per day is for showing up. Just the way I see it. I hope the two of you can both be rational and when the dust settles both learn something good from it.
