that ain't the way i heard it , i was told the judge decided he was right all along . maybe i was misinformed .
I am unaware of any cases. In U.S. vs. Bundy (1998) he argued the land wasn't owned by the federal government but he court ruled it was and that he was trespassing and that the government had the right to enforce injunctions on him for trespassing.
In 2012, again U.S. vs. Bundy, the issue was litigated again due to the cattle having relocated to an area not covered by the original court order.
He also lost a court case in which he argued the federal government lacked jurisdiction because they couldn't own land and that the land must be owned by the state.
He has now evolved to the position that 'he' doesn't recognize the federal government as even existing.
I don't see any court agreeing with his legal positions. Ever.
