June 27, 2025, 11:47:24 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: HAVE YOU HAD YOUR PORK TODAY?
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: ridgebacks: truth or total Bull  (Read 10215 times)
WAARHEID
Strike Dog
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 363



View Profile WWW
« on: June 17, 2009, 08:41:15 pm »



I dont know anyone that would buy a ridgeback that bays.

Well, it's hard to say nosight... I guess I would be curious if they are being hunted by rifle hunters or knife/hog-tie hunters?

Don't get me the wrong way fellas, I'm not trying to put down good catch dogs. Lord knows we need them! If your Ridgeback is catchy, and that's what you want it to do, more power to you... catch'em up son!

But from a historical perspective, a breed purist will want a bay dog. When thinking about the Ridgeback it's important to keep in the back of your mind that for almost the first 30 years that the Ridgeback was recognized by the Kennel Union of South Africa, they were classified as Gun dogs. That's how they were used... they were developed and used by rifle hunters. As rifle hunters they needed bay dogs. If you look back to the wikipedia article I mentioned above, you will find a good historical account that explains this:

Phyllis Archdale who went to Rhodesia in 1919 and bred Ridgebacks there in the 1920s, "Old timers told me that in early days most Dutch transport riders had a Ridgehound as guard to their wagons. They were used to bail up lion and wild pig. Mine did both..."



« Last Edit: June 17, 2009, 08:58:15 pm by WAARHEID » Logged

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!