Also if you go far enuff bad in any dogs ped you will see a lot of dogs that where bred that where not any kin at all. That is how they all started out to begin with . As year have went on in my OPINION people have become obessesed with all this inbreeding, linebreeding and a ton have no ideal what they are doing. I would also venture to say I bet just as many family's of dogs have been hurt are ruined by this . If a mans family of dogs are so great then its his job to find the right click to go with it and know what to do when he does. Did you ever think if mutipal crosses don't work with your line maybe you get average dogs at best then maybe it aint the cross that is bad , maybe your family aint as strong as you think.
Hummmmmm
When the Plott Breed was excepted into the Registry there were 42 registered Plotts in the first registry, ALL belonging to a select group of men surrounding the Plott family members. Would you like to go back and show me how they were not kin?
There are countless strains and lines of Plotts across the Country nowadays but your theory would not hold up if you traced these dogs back "far enough." They were all kin, for sure.
You show me and the rest of us u are the expert.
We'll i'm no expert but I really don't have to show anyone. It's obvious there are more dogs now than in the beginning so it's obtuse to say the father you trace dogs back they will prove to be unrelated the further back you go. So I guess if we traced mankind back to Adam and Eve you you would argue the same about mankind. The fact that the original Plotts breed registry was so small is all the proof I need and in fact there wereally only 42 to begin with but actually less than that were actually used in the breed moving forward. I'm not being a smarta-z, i'm just being "right." So being a smarta-z back is only making you look sillier! Take care
