You can copy/paste all the articles you want and the fact of the matter is the father back you trace dogs the closer kin they will be. This article is referring to a very small group of men and dogs. There are thousands of men and dogs making up this breed now. This is common sense that they dogs in the beginning would be closed related. If you start with few and in the end yof have many the few had to be bred together as well as their offspring, thus making them kin. That is the argument and you are wrong so get on Google and copy someone else's article you know nothing about to try and make yourself look smart.
Oconee, I seen that article as a tool to dispell some of the things you are saying about the origin of plotts. Most of everything you have posted on this thread you try to back up with a book or two. Then when THD copies and pasts an article that doesn't give with what your saying, you claim it's someone else's work and belittle him for it all the while you running back to a book you bought as your own proof. What a hypocrite and poor looser. You and Ruben are two of a kind. Both of you by into what each other say. I really have been waiting for you to see Ruben as most of us do
