December 31, 2025, 06:36:43 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: ETHD....WE'RE ALL ABOUT HOG DOGGIN!
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Thoughts?  (Read 1803 times)
Reuben
Internet Hog Hunting Specialist
**********
Offline Offline

Posts: 9502


View Profile
« on: September 29, 2016, 08:15:34 pm »

       
                                                 STOP THE INTERNET TAKE OVER NOW...

the first thing I will say...if Ted Cruz was running against Hillary our gun rights would not be in jeopardy of being lost because he would be leading by a land slide...

Hillary like Obama would probably like to take away as many of our rights as possible.

The internet is a wonderful tool where we can talk about anything within reason...the far right and the far left it does not matter...as long as it is respectful...no problem...

the united nations are made up of many nations and they have been wanting to take away our gun rights for many years...and you can bet there will be other restrictions if they take over the internet...

what will happen first over the years will be regulated speech and we will only speak about what the government deems acceptable and if were are out of those boundaries we will be arrested or shut down one way or another...that's if we want to continue using the internet...

The constitution was written to prevent too much government interference...those who wrote it came from a place that was ruined by over regulation and they set the constitution up to prevent that from happening...yet we have those that want to take those rights away...

I once used to believe that the majority vote rules in a free society...in some cases it should apply...but in my older age I disagree with that system...

the minority should not implement laws for the majority in a free society...

there should be basic laws written to protect all groups within a society...the constitution should be edited to give more individual freedoms than not...

an example of personal/individual rights...if Joe and Jane Doe like to fish and hunt they should be able to do so because of a constitutional right...and not be able to not hunt on account of a minority who say they can't because of their anti-hunting and anti-fishing beliefs...or for Jane and Joe to not be able to hunt and fish because of a majority vote...

those who do not agree with hunting and fishing is just fine and dandy...they don't have to hunt and fish...it is their right...but don't try to impose it on others...

Jane and Joe Doe should be able to hunt because of constitution rights that says they can...of course we can use common sense and monitor the game and fish populations and adjust limits accordingly...and these rules should be in black and white where no one can throw in a monkey wrench because of a law that is hard to interpret...

and if the internet gets taken over...what I just wrote probably will label me as troublemaker and I could be fined or at the very least have my writings deleted and warned to not do it again...and those rights will go by the wayside and we will never get them back...if can all realize that...then maybe we will never allow it to happen...

I sometimes write my thoughts on the net in hopes that some of the seeds I cast will take root and multiply...
Logged

Training dogs is not about quantity, it's more about timing, the right situations, and proper guidance...After that it's up to the dog...
A hunting dog is born not made...
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!