I'm a firm believer that many dogs bite hard because they want to.
Ditto!
Exactly.
Just because a dog has strong jaws, doesnt make it a good catch dog.
When I mention crunching power vs holding power, im not referring to a lopsa-opsa vs a mastiff, I'm referring to jaw size, ie pit vs mastiff. A mastiff can bite harder than a pit, but like I mentioned earlier, I could care less about how hard a dog can bite, its the length of time that he can hold on with his bite. With all things being equal, I prefer a strong bite, but I dont need a bite that can break legs with one crunch. Some people on this board have posted pictures of their HUGE dogs, and you know that they arent gonna be able to hang on more than a minute or two before having to let go because they are wore out, and then what do they have?>?>?>?>?> a wore out bulldog thats regripping.
Southern Hog Hunter:
A dog you have to play heck with to break off does not necesarily mean he has extreme crunching power, it just means he isnt letting go until you absolutely make him. I prefer having to break the catch dog off as well, it means he has a solid bite and tons or drive, not that he can break bones.

Duece24:
Jaw strength is very important, I would be foolish to say otherwise, but what im trying to say is that most dogs have the biting power neccesary, its the drive and desire to hold on that most dogs lack. Take a patterdale or a jagd, both tiny dogs with little biting power, but they can hang on with the best of them. You may be right, the boxer might not be able to be a CD or an RCD, but I think we just differ in our opinions and I can respect that. i respect your opinion and I can see some validity in your points, I just feel different on the subject so I guess we can just agree to disagree. No hard feelings at all though, you have far more experiance than I do and I am here to learn.
L3:
Nice sarcasm. You have such nice dogs, it would be a shame to trade them in, but I would be the first in line to take them off your hands

. Again, I am not saying that the boxer would excell at catching, but I am saying that if needed to, he most likely could catch. I wouldnt go with a full blooded boxer as a catch dog unless I knew he was already proven given that there are far superior breeds out there for that work (ie your dogos, others AB's, and Pits). But if I needed to infuse some athleticism into a bloodline for some odd reason, the boxer would have plenty to hand out. I was just making the point that the boxer does have some of the pre-dispositioned genetics for it, the athletic ability, and his jaws are most likely more than adequate to hold onto a hog. Though he may not do it well, he could prolly still do it.
Kevin:
Exactly, good comparison
Larger working breed boxers get to be pretty large
From Wikipedia:
Developed in Germany, the Boxer is a breed of stocky, medium-sized, short-haired dog. Boxers are brachycephalic (they have broad, short skulls), and have a square muzzle, mandibular prognathism (an underbite),
very strong jaws and a powerful bite ideal for hanging on to large prey.
HistoryFor more details on this topic, see Bullenbeisser.
The Boxer is part of the Molosser dog group, developed in Germany in the late 1800s from the now extinct Bullenbeisser, a dog of Mastiff descent, and Bulldogs brought in from England. The Bullenbeisser had been working as a hunting dog for centuries, employed in the pursuit of bear,
wild boar, and deer.
Its task was to seize the prey and hold it until the hunters arrived. In later years, faster dogs were favored and a smaller Bullenbeisser was bred in Brabant, in northern Belgium. It is generally accepted that the Brabanter Bullenbeisser was a direct ancestor of today's Boxer.[13]
Also, we all understand that written abilities of a breed as opposed to the actual abilities of the breed, so please understand that I know the difference in the two, this was just to show that the genetics is there. Whether or not is is prevalant in todays boxer, who knows, but the backbone is there.
Again, this is not to argue, I respect all of yall's opinions and there have been many good points. I was originally just trying to say that the boxer could prolly do catch a hog if need be.
Good Hunting everybody!