t-dog
|
|
« Reply #80 on: January 04, 2020, 06:13:49 am » |
|
Thanks old man, those kinda things have always interested me. I think they are doing the breed a favor by allowing those other colors to be registered. Sometimes a color I an indicator. The blue gene in the APBT was a prime example. Back in the day, if a person got a blue pup in a litter, it was culled immediately. Those dogs were inferior in every way, from performance to health. It got the point where that color gene was nearly obsolete. The modern blue pitbull isn't the same. Neo Mastiff was bred in to get the color. I know there have to be standards, that's a given, but you can't exclude things just because it isn't "your preference" if it isn't a detriment like the blue in the pits of old. Breeding for color has hurt and even ruined more than one breed.
Sent from my SM-G892U using Tapatalk
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|